However, i received this back. They're both equally valid in professional writing. What age were you able to start reading successfully to a baby at?
60 Insurance Statistics You Must Read 2024 Market Share Analysis
Writing “at the age of five” is more formal, while “at age five” is more technical or direct. The only difference is in register: At the time of reaching the age he was already performing this function.
From the age of twenty to the age of forty, bessemer lived the life of a journeyman inventor.
He began in the same year as reaching the age. I have no idea what the words into type people were thinking when they decided to specify one style for historical decades and another for age decades, but i agree with you that the decision. Neither implies stopping in any manner. Also, what other ways of writing about different age groups are there?
Years old a woman aged 50 has given birth to twins. I was supposed to write all ages above 12, and not including 12, so i wrote '13+', which in my mind. The law also imposed penalties on orbi, that is, married persons who had no children. The sample consisted of all students at the age of 13 years or older.
Per the macmillan dictionary, aged is an adjective:
Recently, for a scientific publication, i wrote something like the following: They will convey the same meaning in a negative sentence; But in ages and other durational phrases with in (in weeks/months/years/a coon's age/donkey's years) are negative. Someone who is aged 18, 35, 70, etc.
Which is grammatical, but is also a great example of stranding a preposition at the end of the sentence. Thank you for anyone that can give their opinion or cite a source to confirm things. Is 18, 35, 70, etc. When you take into account all ages above a certain age, what is the correct way to write it?
