It Might Be Rigged Nyt This Controversial Nyt Article Is Going Viral See Why Trump Pressed On Qatari Jet Says Only ‘stupid’ People Reject Gifts

Dalbo

It Might Be Rigged Nyt This Controversial Nyt Article Is Going Viral See Why Trump Pressed On Qatari Jet Says Only ‘stupid’ People Reject Gifts

There is no strong distinction between 'may' and 'might'. What is the difference between may have, might have and could have? You still might be of the same opinion as him.

What’s Going On in This Picture? Sept. 12, 2022 The New York Times

I might be going to. I might go to ireland. ==> i thought they might need.

Some people say one, some people say the other, and some make more of a distinction than others.

For the above question, there are two answers with might given by my book: I thought to myself, these sentences may/might need correction. Why is he so irritable? Even if he have everything,he remains unsatisfied.(此处的 have 前省略了 may / might,此时的说话人对于 he 是否 has everything,持 怀疑 但又 不能确定 的态度,即,.

For example, are the three sentences correct and do they convey the same meaning? Dear all, where are you going to for your holiday? It may be that his baby kept both. In indirect speech and thought, the past tense of may and might is might.

10 Ways to Teach About 9/11 With The New York Times The New York Times
10 Ways to Teach About 9/11 With The New York Times The New York Times

Greetings, could you please help me understand the difference between these two sentences?

You might not have done something is also a way of saying that it would have been kind of you not to have done something. You can also say “x could. It might be that he's just tired today. (i'm guessing as to what might be causing his irritablilty.) why is he so irritable?

What’s Going On in This Picture? Sept. 12, 2022 The New York Times
What’s Going On in This Picture? Sept. 12, 2022 The New York Times

New York Post Takes Aim at Trump, and Hits a Nerve The New York Times
New York Post Takes Aim at Trump, and Hits a Nerve The New York Times

Also Read

Share: