A person’s look (their personal style) and a person’s looks (their physical appearance) are used quite differently from each other, as explained in this thread. I wonder if only looks is accepted to refer to a person's physical appearance, and hence the following sentence is wrong: However, i think that including have works better.
94 millionyearold fossilized sea monster is the oldest of its kind in
When asking about someone's physical. Hello everyone, after doing careful research, i found that meticulous about your appearance is an appropriate and also common way to say you care about your physical. If you ask what does she look like you are asking for a detailed description of her appearance.
An entry of appearance is when a lawyer states her appearance for the record (it's entered into the record).
He has a handsome look. If the above is a yes, i. In this sense it's rarely used in the plural. I liked her appearance but not the way she spoke. however, when we're talking about.
Notice of entry of appearance as attorney or representative before the immigration court= notificacion del. Appearance is what a person looks like; For example, when a judge says, counsel, enter your. If you ask how does she look, you are asking for an opinion of her general.
Hola, do you think this translation is accurate?
A striking appearance can almost certainly be used without have, and it is easy to imagine someone saying sentence (1). And how does he look like? In this way, we can see that religious beliefs, to be beliefs. There must be some causal connection, or an appearance thereof, between the fact in question and my acceptance of it.
I'm a bit confused and i am not sure whether the difference between what does he look like?
