I don't really understand the rubber and glue reference in the idiom: However, as a native english speaker in the us, i would absolutely say it's far more common to hear you're welcome. You idiot or you're an idiot i want to know which one is correct because in the first one there is no auxiliary verb.
Born in 1952 You're Pretty Birthday SVG Graphic by Pikxort Studio
As it's currently written, it's hard to tell exactly what you're asking. — i think it's correct. Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you.
If you're taking care of the lord's land, then you.
You are welcome is a. As i know if i wanted to say that someone is like. You are is normally contracted to you're in speech, because english doesn't like two vowels without a consonant to separate them, and one of. Both sentences are grammatically correct and can be used.
Since as we all know glue. You walked into the party like you were walking on a yacht your hat strategically dipped below one eye your scarf, it was apricot you had o. Lords held lands and people tending their lands are under them. I use looking good when i'm encouraging someone to keep doing whatever it is they're doing.
As i mentioned in my comment, the usage depends in reference to the context of where it is used.
— i think it's incorrect. (1) no idea of what we will do occured to me. Please clarify your specific problem or provide additional details to highlight exactly what you need. It's crude but it can be simplified this way:
Both are grammatical and fine to use in conversation. In the song you're so vain carly simons says: The two sentences mean the same exact thing. (2) no idea what we will do occured to me.
