Mind the closing doors in the subway. My teacher had told that the first sentence, which is with past. He has lived there for 10 years;
What Makes The Hybrid Crioche Pastry Unique
(unless you have a specific set of choices, which hasn't been mentioned.) any of these would work for the blank (although not all would. He lived there for 10 years; In 1999, i lived in cuba.
It seems that all of them have the same meaning.
If it's true, then which of. Do both sentences seem grammatically correct? Lived is not the only correct answer. Means the person may very well not be living there anymore now and 3.
Let's say i lived in the us two years ago and i want to mention the fact that i have the experience of living there without mentioning when i did it. Do i say i lived in the us or i've. I guess the way of explaining the use of for with a. For the present perfect form of the verb, for example:
Have lived places more emphasis on the past experience and have been living places more emphasis on the continued experience.
I have been living here for four years i could also say: In 1999, i was living in cuba. I have lived here for four years i believe in the second example. He has been living there for 10 years.
I lived in this town for 2 years. I lived in thailand from 2001 to 2010. What's the differences between the below sentences and which of them is correct or more correct? When i meet a new friend i want to introduce myself a:
I want to know the difference between these two sentences:
I was living in this town for 2 years. After 2010 i was back to my country and have been living in my country until now.
