Mind the closing doors in the subway. After 2010 i was back to my country and have been living in my country until now. If it's true, then which of.
Discover Nile River Map, History, Facts, Location, & Source
Have lived places more emphasis on the past experience and have been living places more emphasis on the continued experience. My teacher had told that the first sentence, which is with past. Lived is not the only correct answer.
He has been living there for 10 years.
Do i say i lived in the us or i've. What's the differences between the below sentences and which of them is correct or more correct? I was living in this town for 2 years. In 1999, i was living in cuba.
He lived there for 10 years; When i meet a new friend i want to introduce myself a: I lived in this town for 2 years. I want to know the difference between these two sentences:
For the present perfect form of the verb, for example:
Do both sentences seem grammatically correct? Means the person may very well not be living there anymore now and 3. Let's say i lived in the us two years ago and i want to mention the fact that i have the experience of living there without mentioning when i did it. (unless you have a specific set of choices, which hasn't been mentioned.) any of these would work for the blank (although not all would.
I have lived here for four years i believe in the second example. I lived in thailand from 2001 to 2010. I guess the way of explaining the use of for with a. In 1999, i lived in cuba.
It seems that all of them have the same meaning.
I have been living here for four years i could also say: He has lived there for 10 years;
